A Critique of DiLorenzos The Real Lincoln Essay -- Thomas J. DiLorenz

A Critique of the Real LincolnThe Real Lincoln A recent face up at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, by doubting Thomas J. DiLorenzo completely shatters the prank of the 16th President as the liberator of the slaves. DiLorenzo provides convincing evidence for Lincolns overt racism as expressed in his documented views on racial supremacy as presentd in his desire to colonise all American blacks outside the United States (p. 4) Lincolns views were matched by the majority in the North who used such tools as state constitutional amendments to prohibit the emigration of black people into Northern states same(p) Lincolns home of Illinois (p. 4) and that the Presidents struggle which killed 620, 000 Americans and destroyed 40% of the economy, was a singularly terrible, unjustified conflict given the proven success in the 19th century of the peaceful end to slavery through the insurance of compensated emancipation (p. 4). DiLorenzo accordingly notes that, Between 18 00 and 1860, dozens of countries, including the entire British Empire, ended slavery peacefully only in the United States was war involved (p. 4). DiLorenzo documents that historys claims that the abolition of slavery as the lede motive behind the Unions aggression against the South is untrue. He states that Lincolns motives were economic and political and in no charge altruistic. Lincoln did oppose slavery, but his opposition did not stem from whatever moral motive. He wished to preserve white labor, and to avoid artificial ostentatiousness of Southern representation in Congress beneath the three-fifths clause of the Constitution, under which every five slaves counted as three free persons for the purpose of allotting mo of congressional seats.DiLorenzo explains that from th... ...ding Fathers had tried to institute through the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.Thomas DiLorenzo does a good play in documenting Lincolns pitilessness and hypocrisy and how historians have covered it up. The founding fathers had a fear of federal governmental abuse. They saw state sovereignty as a protection. Thats why they gave us the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. I found this apply very interesting and it makes you wonder what else we may have learned development up that could be completely untrue according to your elementary check history books. I do however understand that there is ii sides to every story and I wish DiLorenzo did a better job at explaining why history has painted Lincoln as such a hero.Works CitedDiLorenzo, Thomas. The Real Lincoln A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War. Three Rivers Press, 2003.