Spanish American War

Analyze the responses to ii of the following to Secretary of State John Hays stare that the Spanish American War was a splendid little state of contend William Jennings Bryan, Theodore Roosevelt, Alfred Thayer Mahan, Emilio Aguinaldo When Secretary of State John Hay stated that the Spanish American War was a splendid little war, he stock mixed responses from people such as William Jennings Bryan, Theodore Roosevelt, Alfred Thayer Mahan, and Emilio Aguinaldo. Some people of the Philippines, particularly the nationalist leader Emilio Aguinaldo, disagreed with Hays statement.They were upset that they were first beingness denied independence from Spain, and now the join States of America. However, even having fought in the Spanish-American War aboard the Americans, Aguinaldo led bands of guerilla fighters against the U. S. It took three years, and numerous causalities to end the revolt. Theodore Roosevelt, on the opposite hand, saw potential in the lands controlled by Spain. He ordered a fleet to the Philippines. The American Fleet destroyed the Spanish Fleet. Contrary to the beliefs of Theodore Roosevelt, William Jennings Bryan savagely attacked the idea of American imperialism.He believed that imperialism was wrong, and the joined States should stay out of fighting wars for conquest. duration many Americans too, questioned imperialism, they saw the cutting territory, including the Philippines, acquired during the war as an accomplishment. Last moreover not least, Alfred Thayer Mahan believed that a strong naval power would crucial if a res publica wanted to become the finest, stintingally and militarily. A strong force presence would open foreign markets which would lead the coupled States to become a cosmos power.William Jennings Bryan vigorously attacked the growth of American Imperialism. One positive final result of the Spanish American war was its effect on the modality two Americans and Europeans thought about the United States as a formi dable array power Discuss whether or not US foreign indemnity from 1890-1914 was in the first place guided by scotch motives. The period after the civic War saw the development of a booming economy render by the industrialization of America, which created the path for a major change in U. S diplomacy policies with the rest of the globe.Rather than being an isolated country and tutelage with the advice of George Washington to stay neutral concerning any European affairs, the United States became an imperialist and world power with territories fadeing across the pacific and very active in European affairs. U. S foreign policy from 1890-1920 was in the first place guided by economic motives. One of the motives why the U. S foreign policy was principally guided by economic desire was to protect American interests deliver in otherwise countries.Another motive why the U.S foreign policy was principally guided by economic pipe dream was because the U. S needed new markets on w hich to sell their surplus of prove and produced goods. One of the motives why the U. S foreign policy was principally guided by economic ambition was because the U. S needed new markets on which to sell their surplus of farm and produced goods. The blessed American soil was mass-producing crops and industries were thriving in production of American goods the markets in the United States were over flowing with goods and the United States needed to extend their sale to other countries markets.The four biggest imperialistic powers of the time were Great Britain, France, Germany, and short to be the United States were all competing to get the advantages of the markets in China, and since China was dealing with their own struggles like corruption, and bad leadership, many countries were taking advantage of the economic gains in the Chinese markets unfairly. Secretary of state John Hay proposed an free Door policy in China which would guarantee that all nations hand over a fair chan ce in the Chinese markets.He proposed this because the United States was mollify trying to prove itself and if all the countries accepted this policy the United States would operate having access to the profitable markets. As the U. S economy grew so did ambition and a sense of great nationalism in the United States and the unexclusive was calling for more. Compare and contrast the foreign policies of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson toward Latin America twain Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson had utilized their own foreign policies toward Latin America that differed from another.Theodore Roosevelt proposed the aggressive, Big-Stick diplomacy in dealing with Latin America, whereas Wilson operated using moral diplomacy as his way of managing foreign affairs. The idea behind Roosevelts Big-Stick Policy was speaking softly further carrying a big stick, meaning that negotiations should conclude peacefully, but rivals should be threatened with the military. President Roose velt had made several attempts to build the United States reputation as a world power. His policy, however, was unpopular amongst many for gaolbreak the customary non-involvement policy in international governing. T.R was enthusiastic to amaze the construction of a canal through the Isthmus of Panama, so the Hay-Pauncefote treaty of 1901 was passed. This allowed the United States to begin to dig the canal without British involvement. Woodrow Wilson on the other hand, respected other nations rights and supported the spread of democracy. Wilson had direct troops over and arranged an arms embargo with the Mexican government. When these troops were detained, he had them occupy Veracruz and war seemed imminent until the Countries of Argentina, Chile and Brazil liaise in the affair. Wilson had also proposed the Johns Act of 1916 which granted U. S.citizenship to all the inhabitants in Puerto anti-racketeering law while providing limited self-government. In addition to this, Wilson kept a contribute of marines in Nicaragua and ordered U. S. troops into Haiti in 1915 and the Dominican Republic in 1916.He argued that such intervention was necessary to maintain stability in the portion and protect the Panama Canal. Assess the importance of TWO of the following in the US decision to declare war against Spain in 1898 yellow journalism, sink of the Maine, US business interests, Cuban revolution Americas short war with Spain in 1898 was the nations first step on the pathway to becoming a world power.The U. S. victory brought with it the unintended possession of the Philippines and a vested interest in the politics of the Pacific region that would ultimately lead to conflict with Japan. As an conterminous outcome of the war, America found itself embroiled in an insurgency in the Philippines that closely mimicked the conflict in Vietnam over 60 years later. Cuba, a Spanish colony, had been in rebellion since 1895. The brutal Spanish response morose American sympat hies to the Cuban insurgents.The US Battleship Maine arrived in Havana nurture in January 1898 with a dual mission to protect American interests and give birth the Spanish with a show of force. At 940 PM on the evening of February 15, an explosion ripped the forward hull quickly send the ship to the bottom of the harbor, killing two hundred sixty-six of the 345 clustering members. Investigations started immediately. A US Naval Board of Inquiry attributed the sinking to an outside(a) explosion a conclusion interpreted by many as referring to a mine placed beneath the ship. The finger of blame pointed to Spanish tr each(prenominal)ery.An anti-Spanish press particularly the Yellow Journalism of the Hearst and Pulitzer newspapers enflamed American public aspect and raised it to a war-fever pitch. social intercourse clamored for action. President McKinley reluctantly succumbed to insistence and asked Congress to declare war on April 21. Congress obliged on April 25, 1898. The wa r lasted only 3 months and cost the U. S. about 400 killed or wounded. The United States gained the Philippines, Puerto Rico and Guam and emerged as a power to be reckoned with on the world stage. Cuba gained independence from Spain.For Spain it was a humiliating defeat. Both her Atlantic and Pacific fleets were displace to the bottom of the sea and with them went Spains prestige as a world power. In what ways did the United States relationship with Japan become more emulous after 1900? In the first two decades of the twentieth century, the relationship in the midst of the United States and Japan was marked by increasing tension and correspondent attempts to use diplomacy to reduce the threat of conflict.Each side had territory and interests in Asia that they were concerned the other might threaten. U. S.treatment of Nipponese immigrants, and competition for economic and commercial opportunities in China also heightened tensions. At the same time, each countrys territorial clai ms in the Pacific formed the flat coat for several agreements between the two nations, as each government desire to protect its own strategic and economic interests. Tensions rose over Nipponese actions in northeast China and immigration to the United States. In 1905, the Nipponese started to establish more formal control over South Manchuria by forcing China to give Japan ownership rights to the South Manchurian Railway.The Nipponese used this opening to make further inroads into northeast China, causing the Roosevelt political science concern that this violated the ideals of free enterprise and the preservation of Chinas territorial integrity. Simultaneously, leading Nipponese officials expressed frustration with the treatment of Japanese immigrants in the United States. A U. S. -Japanese treaty signed in 1894 had guaranteed the Japanese the right to immigrate to the United States, and to enjoy the same rights in the country as U. S. citizens.In 1906, however, the San Fran cisco Board of Education enacted a measure to send Japanese and Chinese children to segregated schools. The Government of Japan was outraged by this policy, claiming that it violated the 1894 treaty. In a series of notes exchanged between late 1907 and earlier 1908, known collectively as the Gentlemens Agreement, the U. S. Government agreed to pressure the San Francisco authorities to withdraw the measure, and the Japanese Government promised to restrict the immigration of laborers to the United States.