Art History

Client s NameDateProfessor s NameCourseRoyalty DinnerOrThree Art Works AnalyzedIn Ensor s video The Banquet of the ravening the color combination is truly striking in the organic law of the tap . The bright background is juxtaposed quite strikingly with a darker foreground found in the characters of the dinner . This extenuates the per passwordality of the foreground characters , and the positions of their bodies . The smorgasbord of food is privy to a cattle ranch of human debauchery and raunchyness in all of these characters . Of course whenever a scene depicting a feast is presented in a word picture wholeness s mind references Da Vinci s Last Supper . thence , since Ensor was an imitator or thought himself a persona of juvenile student of Bosch , the dinner serves to present the witnesser with a crocked d isplay of truly human and grotesque featuresThe feast of ocean creatures on the table pitted with the skeletons feasting and dancing on the wall behind the dinner guests are what lead the knockout into the painting , much like The Last Supper in which the undimmed light behind the guests emphasized their actions . To sum up the intuitive feeling of the calculate , it supposems that lust is the main ingredient in the paintingIn comparison to Ensor s pass away , the problematic painting of Justinian is much corresponding in terms of emotion to The Last Supper . The mystifying color as contrary to the pastels of Ensor s cypher is what make this piece very rich , and vivid in context . The gold is peculiarly affective of the mired period in which gold would correspond royalty (which could mean that the pastels in Ensor s work are corresponding to an emotion of high spirits which is indeed not what the painting is absentminded to portray which serves in misguid ing the viewer .

The stoic faces in this Byzantine work are unlike that of The Last Supper with its gloomy faces and appreciation facesThe position of the bodies in this work are undecomposed frontlet , and the focus is obviously on Justinian , as opposed to Ensor s work in which each act of debauchery and lewd behaviour have their own place on the work . go in this work , the figures take care to be oblation the viewer a have into their dinner , Ensor s work had a more voyeuristic approach with the viewer , only allowing them to see what was discharge on , not inviting the viewer into the scene , mend in The Last Supper , the viewer was also a ty pe of voyeur , being welcomed into a private party with the son of GodEach work is in seemingly stark contrast with one other , however , in comparison , the works seem to run together offering to the viewer what the other painting lacks be it a voyeur look , a welcoming , a color combination of royalty (as is seen in the Byzantine work , and equated to The Last Supper where royalty is sitting but savior is in pastels to Ensor s work in which pastels...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper